Records and altitudinal assessment of Amblyomma aureolatum and Amblyomma ovale (Acari: Ixodidae) in the State of Rio de Janeiro, southeast Brazil

Information on the altitudinal distribution of the hard ticks Amblyomma aureolatum and Amblyomma ovale in Brazil is scarce and mainly limited to occasional records. In this study we report our evaluation of records on the altitudinal distribution of A. aureolatum and A. ovale collected from dogs and humans and directly from the environment (host-questing ticks), based on active or passive procedures. The collections were conducted in rural areas of municipalities in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil between 2013 and 2017. Active procedures consisted of dragging or flagging, visual examination of vegetation and removal of ticks present on the authors’ clothing or on infested dogs. Overall, 222 ticks were collected. The altitudes at the collection sites ranged from 98 to 1220 m a.s.l. We noted a significant difference in the altitudinal distribution of A. aureolatum and A. ovale (Mann–Whitney U-test, U = 518.5, P < 0.001). The overlap of these two species occurred at altitudes of between 650 and 900 m a.s.l. The results indicated that the higher the altitude, the greater the probability for the occurrence of A. aureolatum and, conversely, the lower the likelihood for the occurrence of A. ovale. The findings of this study improve currrent knowledge on the bioecology of these tick species and have implications for studies on the epidemiology of spotted fever in Brazil. Graphical Abstract

Faccini et al. Parasites & Vectors (2022) 15:136 ovale [15,16]. In addition, a single male of A. ovale collected from a domestic dog in Paraty City, state of Rio de Janeiro was reported as infected with Rickettsia felis [12].
Information on altitudinal effects on tick distribution in Brazil is scarce, with most of the records incidental and limited to an association with dogs included in studies of tick-borne diseases. In the specific case of A. aureolatum and A. ovale, the results which are available indicate that the former species prefers much higher altitudes than the latter, but also that they may occur sympatrically in some areas. This distribution was found by Sabatini et al. [17] who reported free-living specimens of A. aureolatum at altitudes of higher than 700 m a.s.l. and A. ovale at altitudes of lower than 70 m a.s.l. They also reported the occurrence of both species at an altitude of 993 m a.s.l. in a survey conducted in an Atlantic Rain Forest Reserve in the State of São Paulo. In an earlier study, Medeiros et al. [2] reported A. aureolatum and A. ovale infesting the same individual dog at lower altitudes (< 100 m a.s.l.) in the state of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil. Ogrzewalska et al. [18] collected only A. aureolatum from dogs at altitudes of 765-1000 m a.s.l., whereas Szabó et al. [10] reported only A. ovale in dogs and from the environment at 23 m a.s.l. in different areas of the Atlantic Rain Forest in the state of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil. Importantly, Barbieri et al. [3], in a specifically designed study conducted in São Paulo state, reported that the probability of finding A. aureolatum in municipalities situated between 101 and 700 m a.s.l. was ninefold higher than that in municipalities situated at 100 m a.s.l., or 31.5-fold higher in municipalities located above 700 m a.s.l. when compared with municipalities located 100 m a.s.l.
The aim of this short report is twofold: (i) to report new municipality records of A. aureolatum and A. ovale; and (ii) to investigate possible ecological differences in relation to altitude between A. aureolatum and A. ovale in the state of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil.
All ticks were collected in rural areas in municipalities located within the state of Rio de Janeiro between 2013 and 2017 ( Fig. 1). Ticks were recovered from dogs and humans and directly from the environment (hostquesting ticks), either by active or passive procedures. Active procedures consisted of dragging or flagging, visual searches on vegetation and removal of ticks from the authors and infested dogs. Passive tick surveillance consisted of veterinarians submitting ticks for examination which had been collected on dogs or on themselves and/or their clothing. Ticks infesting dogs were collected manually after physical restraint with a canvas fabric muzzle. Only nymphs and adults were collected in the present study. After collection, all ticks were placed into plastic vials containing 70% ethanol for subsequent morphological identification according to the recommendations of Dantas-Torres et al. [19].
For statistical analysis, each specimen was considered to be a single tick record. The altitudinal records, recorded as meters above sea level, did not present normality by the Shapiro-Wilk test (W = 0.89135; P < 0.001). The probable differences in altitude among the municipalities of records in terms of both tick species were compared by the Mann-Whitney test, followed by the Spearman's rank-order correlation test (Spearman's correlation coefficient r s ) [20]. All analyses were performed using R version 4.1.2 [21].
All records of both ticks were either from rural or forested areas. Ticks were collected in 26 municipalities, totaling 50 sites at different altitudes ( Fig. 1). In some municipalities, more than one collection was made per site. The altitudes of the collection sites ranged from 98 (A. ovale) to 1220 m a.s.l. (A. aureolatum) ( Tables 1, 2). Overall, 222 ticks were collected. Amblyomma aureolatum was collected at 22 (44%) sites, A. ovale at 23 (46%) sites and five (10%) of the sites contained both A. aureolatum and A. ovale, distributed among the following sources: 51 dogs (75.6%), 11 humans (16.2%) and six (8.2%) directly from the environmental sites (Table 1). In terms of hosts/environment, A. aureolatum was collected from 28 dogs, six humans and two environmental sites, and A. ovale was collected from 23 dogs, five humans and four environmental sites. Regarding concurrent infestations, both tick species were collected in eight sites located in six municipalities on dogs (seven individuals) and directly from the environment (two sites). There was a significant difference in terms of altitudinal distribution of A. aureolatum and A. ovale (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 518.5, P < 0.001). It was determined that A. aureolatum showed a preference for higher altitudes, while A. ovale was recovered more frequently from sites located at low altitudes (Fig. 2). As shown in the scatter diagram (Fig. 2), a clear overlap exists in the altitudinal stratification of A. aureolatum and A. ovale, particularly at altitudes between 650 to 900 m a.s.l., based on specimens collected from seven dogs (37 ticks) and two environmental sites (nine ticks). In the case of A. aureolatum, there was a positive or increasing linear relationship, whereby the higher the altitude, the higher the occurrence of ticks of this species; however, Spearman's correlation coefficient was not significant (r s = 0.27, P = 0.1799). In contrast, a decreasing or negative linear relationship was observed for A. ovale, whereby, the higher the altitude, the lower the occurrence of that species; however, once again the Spearman's correlation coefficient was not significant (r s = − 0.41, P = 0.0511). Based on our data, we conclude that the higher the altitude, the greater the probability for the occurrence of A. aureolatum and, conversely, the lower the likelihood for the occurrence of A. ovale. This conclusion is substantiated by data generated from an ongoing survey of ticks on dogs whose owners reside in the Environmental Protection Area of Palmares (EPAP), which is located in the municipality of Paty do Alferes, state of Rio de Janeiro, at altitudes of 840 to 1000 m a.s.l. All ticks collected on dogs were identified as A. aureolatum (119 adult ticks collected on 43 dogs), which one adult A. ovale collected from a single dog. Our findings are broadly similar to those obtained by Barbieri et al. [3] regarding altitudinal differences between the occurrence of A. aureolatum and A. ovale in the state of São Paulo. The mean altitudes of A. aureolatum (862 m a.s.l.) and A. ovale (560 m a.s.l.) observed in the present study were close to those reported by Barbieri et al. [3] (757 and 596 m a.s.l., respectively). In contrast to the data of Barbieri et al. [3] generated in São Paulo state (100-700 m a.s.l.; 23 ºS latitude), we found convincing evidence for overlapping of the two species at altitudes between 650 to 956 m a.s.l. (22 ºS). At a lower latitude (20° S), in the state of Espírito Santo, Acosta et al. [22] also reported an overlapping of A. aureolatum and A. ovale at altitudes above 700 m a.s.l.. In contrast, studies conducted in the south of Brazil, at higher latitudes (26-27 °S), the overlapping of A. aureolatum and A. ovale was observed at a far lower altitudinal range (below 100 m a.s.l.) by Medeiros et al. [2] and Barbieri et al. [23]. These contrasting ranges of tick occurrence could be explained by climate variation (winter and summer) in relation to latitude, as was discussed by Barbieri et al. [3]. At higher latitudes (e.g. southern Brazil), winters tend be more severe/colder in low-altitude regions than they are at the equivalent altitudes within regions at lower latitudes, thus favoring the establishment of A. aureolatum. However, in regions at lower latitudes, as was the case in the present study (22° S), winters are generally severe only at higher altitudes, with warmer summers at both low and high altitudes. In these environments, A. aureolatum can be expected to occur predominantly at high altitudes. Higher altitude regions (e.g. altitudes above> 900 m a.s.l.) of Rio de Janeiro state, such as Petrópolis, Teresópolis, Friburgo (Rio de Janeiro state), have an average annual temperature < 21 °C, but can have periods with negative temperature values in winter [24]. Conversely, the altitudinal range of A. ovale can extend to higher altitudes (≈ 700-900 m a.s.l.) where the winter is theoretically cooler than regions found at lower than 700 m a.s.l. (less severe winters and hot summer). This observation may indicate that locations in the state of Rio de Janeiro at higher altitudes (e.g. 700-900 m a.s.l.) present favorable abiotic conditions for A. ovale when compared to the same altitudes in the southern region of the country, due to an increased temperature that is a consequence the lower latitude. In this context, Luz et al. [9] found both A. ovale and A. aureolatum above 700 m a.s.l., at 22° S latitude, in the Atlantic Forest of the state of Rio de Janeiro, and Szabó et al. [25] found A. ovale at 863 m a.s.l. in an area of Savanna, at 18°S latitude, in the state of Minas Gerais. Moreover, Acosta et al. [22] found A. ovale at 720 m a.s.l., at 20° S latitude. Under these circumstances, one may assume that temperature, as affected by latitude and altitude, interferes with/has an effect on the occurrence of A. aureolatum or A. ovale. This hypothesis is confirmed by the wide distribution of A. ovale, occurring in all Brazilian biomes [1,3,7,13,15,25], and the more restricted occurrence of A. aureolatum, being concentrated in cooler environments in the south of the country and in some high-altitude regions of the southeast [2,3,7,22]. Nieri-Bastos et al. [15] collected ticks from dogs in the state of Bahia, Brazil, at locations below latitude 12 ºS and at an altitude of ~ 900 m a.s.l. and reported only the occurrence of A. ovale. In addition, findings from field observations conducted in the Amazon biome (2 S°, state of Maranhão, Brazil), where A. aureolatum is absent and A. ovale is frequently recorded, demonstrated that < 20% of A. aureolatum eggs hatched when exposed to high temperatures (~ 30 °C summer) (Hermes R Luz, unpublished data). In these conditions, it is possible to speculate that A. aureolatum would be more sensitive to high temperatures (~ 30 °C) than A. ovale. Based on that presumption, and considering the predictions of the increase in the global average temperature in the coming decades (1.5-3.5 °C) [26], it may be reasonable to predict that the current distribution range of A. aureolatum will decrease, simultaneously accompanied by an expansion of the range of A. ovale. However, the data from the present study are not sufficient to support such speculations. Further experiments are necessary to clarify the effects of temperature on the biology and distribution of these ixodids in nature. In addition, it is pertinent to note that dogs whose owners live in areas of environmental protection generally move freely between high-and lowaltitude areas, potentially contributing to the transport of ticks between areas at different altitudes.
The results presented herein, in combination with those reported in the literature, are of enormous importance for improving our understanding of the biology and distribution of A. aureolatum and A. ovale in Brazil, and should be considered as contributing to studies, including epidemiological investigations, of BSF. In the state of Rio de Janeiro, there were approximately 160 confirmed cases of BSF and 62 (39%) deaths between 1980 and 2014, distributed over regions of low and high altitudes [27].
In all of those regions, A. sculptum is the only confirmed vector of BSF to humans, although the involvement of A. aureolatum (high altitudes) or A. ovale (low altitudes) remains unclear despite the fact that those species transmit, respectively, R. rickettsii and R. parkeri [28]. Interestingly, R. rickettsii and R. parkeri, Hepatozoon canis [29], Babesia vogeli and Rangelia vitalli [30] have all been diagnosed in dogs having contact with forest habitats at high (mountainous) and low (valleys) altitudes in the state of Rio de Janeiro, but the association with ticks, including A. aureolatum and A. ovale, as vectors of these agents has not yet been robustly and conclusively demonstrated.